http://www.labnol.org/forums/topic/feedburnercom-vs-feedburnergooglecom Help Center Topic: feedburner.com VS feedburner.google.com? en-US Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:25:07 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.1 q http://www.labnol.org/forums/search.php http://www.labnol.org/forums/topic/feedburnercom-vs-feedburnergooglecom#post-4466 Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:39:59 +0000 arpit123 4466@http://www.labnol.org/forums/ <p>No too much. Google purchased FeedBurner &#38; now in process to move it to a new domain feedburner.google.com</p> <p>If you use feedburner.google.com to burn your feeds, you would have the resultant URL as feedproxy.google.com/xyz</p> <p>Moreover, adsense for feeds is enabled in new feedburner. You can move to Google Feedburner from older feedburner without losing any subscriber (google claims so)&#38; with a mouse click only.</p> <p>:) </p> http://www.labnol.org/forums/topic/feedburnercom-vs-feedburnergooglecom#post-4460 Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:53:31 +0000 jitendra.web 4460@http://www.labnol.org/forums/ <p>what is the difference between <a href="http://feedburner.com" rel="nofollow">http://feedburner.com</a> and <a href="http://feedburner.google.com?" rel="nofollow">http://feedburner.google.com?</a> </p>